|   | 
    
      
        Studio Associato Bernardo Secchi Paola Viganò 
          Architecture | Urbanism | Landscape  | 
       
      
        | le Grand Paris : International Consultation of research and development for the future | 
       
     
        
      
        
        
          | client: | 
          French Government, Public  Institution for Business and Cultural Works | 
         
        
          | program: | 
           territorial vision | 
         
        
          | date: | 
          2008-2009 | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          | consultant: | 
          IUAV (L.Fabian, E.Giannotti, P.Pellegrini), PVT France (F. Reutenauer, F.Prybyla, M.Lenz), Ingenieurburo Hausladen GMBH (G.Hausladen, J.Bauer, J.Comelia, C.Bonnet, R.Frohler), MIT and P-REX (A.Berger, Cleson and P-REX, case Brown), MOX (A.Quarteroni, P.Secchi, C.D'Angelo, F.Nobile, F.Della Rossa) EMU European Master in Urbanism, Fotography (T.Cos)  | 
         
        
          | team: | 
           studio  
            
             , A.Calò, D.Chang, T.Cos, N.Fonty, A.Pagnacco 
             | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          | link: | 
          ATELIER INTERNATIONAL  DU GRAND PARIS  | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          The consultancy study on Great Paris  Region is divided in three parts. The first part ''the porous city'': a knowledge  strategy for XXI century -the after Kyoto age- metropolis makes clear our  approach to figure out contemporary metropolis situations complexity and depict  a possible future. We followed here this pattern: Paris, as others metropolis,  will have to face, in the future, some important issues. This drives to the  need of considering and build different 'scenarios'. In chapter two, we made a  comparison with other metropolis through common criteria, specifying Paris  diversity; not drawn only on long time fixed icons. Great Paris is neither only  a main tourist venue, nor the mental images Paris inhabitants have of their  city. A trial for a new approach study was our guideline. The second part ''the  porous city illustrates three different 'scenarios' we consider fundamental for  the XXI century -the after Kyoto - metropolis and its future. the scenario 1 took  as a model a future of 100% durable energy situation; the second scenario envisages  the creation of a new great wetlands system in the metropolitan area, aiming at  a composed ecological and recreational system starting from the 'dross' biotic  system; and, at last, the shift from a hierarchical vertical system to a horizontal  isotropic mass transportation system. In the third part, finally, we will  propose some strategic projects, interacting with the three scenarios.  | 
         
        
       
       |